Viqar Aslam1, Muhammad Bilal2, Muhammad Ayaz1, Lubna Gul1, Alina Zaidi1, Shabir Hasan1
1Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, 2Department of Surgery, District Head Quarters (DHQ) Hospital, Charsadda
Objective: To evaluate the pattern of abdominal injuries the value of the surgery in assisting diagnosis, laparotomy and mortality rate.
Methodology: Out of 1923 total trauma patients 886 individuals were included in the study from a tertiary care hospital. Demographic, trauma-related traits, laparotomies with their indications, etiology and the organs affected were all collected. With SPSS 23 were used to evaluate data
Results: The mean age patients were 27.05 years mostly male. Mortality and negative laparotomy rate were 5.9 and 15.4 percent respectively. Blunt injures were more than penetrating. Spleen was the frequent organ damage.
Conclusion: Blunt trauma with spleen was mostly involved organ. Mortality and negative laparotomy rate are comparable to other studies.
Keywords: Trauma, Abdomen Laparotomy, Mortality, Spleen,
Patients who have experienced blunt or penetrating trauma are frequently candidates for laparotomy.1 Globally, blunt trauma injuries are thought to account for between 78.6 and 95.6% of all injuries, whereas abdominal trauma injuries account for between 9 and 15% of all reported injuries and have a high rate of morbidity.2-6 However, penetrating injuries are an uncommon occurrence in the majority of European nations.7-9 In contrast, exposure is higher in places like the USA and South Africa where trauma patients with penetrating abdominal injuries arrive in large numbers8,10-13. Hemodynamic instability or persistent bleeding during resuscitation from an intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal source was the most common reason for laparotomies.5 Patients who suffer a penetrating injury to the abdomen or diaphragm and present with hemodynamic instability, hemorrhage-mediated hypotension, organ damage, and peritonitis are frequently known candidates for an emergency laparotomy due to the injury. Laparotomy for trauma is linked to a significant incidence of early postoperative morbidities and fatalities.6,9,10 Negative laparotomies are also responsible for problems and extended hospital stays14. In order to determine the pattern of abdominal injuries necessitating laparotomy and the value of the surgery in assisting diagnosis, this study was created.
All patients who received an emergency laparotomy for trauma between January 2019 and January 2023 were included in this descriptive cross-sectional study that was carried out in the tertiary care hospital Peshawar and approved by the ethical council by using non probability consecutive sampling technique. The sample size was calculated by WHO calculator with 5% margin of error and 95% confidence level. Patients who were managed non operatively, had a history of multiple injuries, were hemodynamically stable, and had missing data were all disqualified from the study. Demographic information, trauma-related traits, laparotomies pattern with their indications, the etiology of the damage, and the organs affected were all collected. SPSS 25.0 was used to analyze the data, and the frequency tables were converted to percentages. Data that is categorical or dichotomous is displayed as percentages
1923 trauma victims were admitted over the course of the 5-year study. Penetrating injuries made up 133 (15%), whereas blunt trauma made up 753 (85%). After screening all trauma patients during the study period and excluding the 1037 who did not undergo a trauma laparotomy, we found 886 patients who were eligible for study inclusion.
Table I. Causes and characteristics of trauma |
||
Trauma characteristics |
Cause of Injury |
Frequency (%) |
Blunt |
Accident |
702 (79.23) |
Conflict |
51 (5.75) |
|
Penetrating |
Accident |
99 (11.17) |
Sharp object |
22 (2.48) |
|
Fire Arm |
12 (1.35) |
|
Table II. Organ damage due to different trauma characteristics |
|||||
Damage Organ |
Blunt |
Penetrating |
|||
Accident |
Conflict |
Accident |
Sharp object |
Fire Arm |
|
Liver |
134 |
14 |
29 |
05 |
03 |
Liver and associated organs |
112 |
06 |
11 |
02 |
01 |
Spleen |
154 |
16 |
33 |
05 |
04 |
Spleen and associated organs |
124 |
05 |
09 |
03 |
01 |
Kidneys |
04 |
01 |
02 |
00 |
00 |
Small Intestine |
76 |
04 |
05 |
02 |
01 |
Colon |
98 |
05 |
09 |
05 |
02 |
Others |
00 |
00 |
01 |
00 |
00 |
Mortality rate. 7.9% |
|||||
Historically, 40% of patients who underwent trauma laparotomies died. The death rates between 7 and 21% in more recent literature are noticeably lower. Damage Control Surgery (DCS) and Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR), which are now essential components of the treatment approach for critically injured trauma patients to lower the risk of morbidity and mortality, may in part be responsible for these positive outcomes.8,14,15
In our research, our population, which consists mainly of younger males, is comparable to prior studies. A significant source of morbidity and mortality is still a major trauma. An estimated 10% of injuries in Europe are due to abdominal trauma. Both blunt and penetrating injuries frequently necessitate surgical exploration in the form of a trauma laparotomy, despite the significance of the distinction between the two. 15% of the trauma population had piercing injuries. When compared to European and Scandinavian nations, this is greater, but it is on a level with other nations outside of Europe.7-9
Mortality rates associated with trauma laparotomies have been reported to range from 6 to 21% globally.5,16 We found that spleen, liver, and colon injuries were overrepresented among the injuries, and that the overall fatality rate was 5.9%. Here, we include auto accidents as the most frequent causes of blunt and penetrating trauma. The liver and spleen were the two most often affected organs. The use of laparotomy is not required due to its complications, according to recent findings, which also show that imaging modalities and a number of biomarkers can be utilized to diagnose trauma in the present era.6,8 This is yet further highlighted by the fact that our population is using this strategy more often, as seen by the fact that our negative laparotomy rates (15.4%) are far higher than the published rates of 3.9% from worldwide high-volume centers. However, other research has shown that negative laparotomy incidences can range widely, from 6 to 36%. One reason is that more patients with blunt liver or splenic damage trauma can avoid having a laparotomy because the increased access to interventional radiology.3-5 Depending on the surgical experience of the care team, both unfavorable laparotomy rates and overall results may be affected.
This study's overall rates, results, and outcomes of trauma laparotomies are comparable to those from comparable European trauma systems, but they are different from data from locations with higher incidence of penetrating traumas.

An Official Publication of
Islamabad Medical & Dental College
Volume 13 Issue 3
Muhammad Bilal
Email:
bilalsurg@gmail.com
Cite this article. Aslam V, Bilal M, Ayaz M, Gul L, Zaidi A, Hassan S. Pattern of Abdominal Injuries, Organ Involved and Rate of Negative Laprotomy in Tertiary Care Hospital. J Islamabad Med Dental Coll. 2024; 13(3): 433-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v13i3.1005