Pattern of Abdominal Injuries, Organ Involved and Rate of Negative Laprotomy in Tertiary Care Hospital

Viqar Aslam1, Muhammad Bilal2, Muhammad Ayaz1, Lubna Gul1, Alina Zaidi1, Shabir Hasan1

1Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, 2Department of Surgery, District Head Quarters (DHQ) Hospital, Charsadda

Objective: To evaluate the pattern of abdominal injuries the value of the surgery in assisting diagnosis, laparotomy and mortality rate.
Methodology: Out of 1923 total trauma patients 886 individuals were included in the study from a tertiary care hospital. Demographic, trauma-related traits, laparotomies with their indications, etiology and the organs affected were all collected. With SPSS 23 were used to evaluate data
Results: The mean age patients were 27.05 years mostly male. Mortality and negative laparotomy rate were 5.9 and 15.4 percent respectively. Blunt injures were more than penetrating. Spleen was the frequent organ damage.
Conclusion: Blunt trauma with spleen was mostly involved organ. Mortality and negative laparotomy rate are comparable to other studies.
Keywords: Trauma, Abdomen Laparotomy, Mortality, Spleen,

Patients who have experienced blunt or penetrating trauma are frequently candidates for laparotomy.1 Globally, blunt trauma injuries are thought to account for between 78.6 and 95.6% of all injuries, whereas abdominal trauma injuries account for between 9 and 15% of all reported injuries and have a high rate of morbidity.2-6 However, penetrating injuries are an uncommon occurrence in the majority of European nations.7-9 In contrast, exposure is higher in places like the USA and South Africa where trauma patients with penetrating abdominal injuries arrive in large numbers8,10-13. Hemodynamic instability or persistent bleeding during resuscitation from an intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal source was the most common reason for laparotomies.5 Patients who suffer a penetrating injury to the abdomen or diaphragm and present with hemodynamic instability, hemorrhage-mediated hypotension, organ damage, and peritonitis are frequently known candidates for an emergency laparotomy due to the injury. Laparotomy for trauma is linked to a significant incidence of early postoperative morbidities and fatalities.6,9,10 Negative laparotomies are also responsible for problems and extended hospital stays14. In order to determine the pattern of abdominal injuries necessitating laparotomy and the value of the surgery in assisting diagnosis, this study was created.

All patients who received an emergency laparotomy for trauma between January 2019 and January 2023 were included in this descriptive cross-sectional study that was carried out in the tertiary care hospital Peshawar and approved by the ethical council by using non probability consecutive sampling technique. The sample size was calculated by WHO calculator with 5% margin of error and 95% confidence level. Patients who were managed non operatively, had a history of multiple injuries, were hemodynamically stable, and had missing data were all disqualified from the study. Demographic information, trauma-related traits, laparotomies pattern with their indications, the etiology of the damage, and the organs affected were all collected. SPSS 25.0 was used to analyze the data, and the frequency tables were converted to percentages. Data that is categorical or dichotomous is displayed as percentages

1923 trauma victims were admitted over the course of the 5-year study. Penetrating injuries made up 133 (15%), whereas blunt trauma made up 753 (85%). After screening all trauma patients during the study period and excluding the 1037 who did not undergo a trauma laparotomy, we found 886 patients who were eligible for study inclusion.

Table I.     Causes and characteristics of trauma         

Trauma characteristics

Cause of Injury

Frequency (%)

Blunt

Accident

702 (79.23)

Conflict

51 (5.75)

Penetrating

Accident

99 (11.17)

Sharp object

22 (2.48)

Fire Arm

12 (1.35)



The mean age of the patients were 27.5 years. Male to female ratio were 9:2 with a mortality rate of 5.9 %. It was found that the negative laparotomy rate was 15.4%. The most damaged organ was spleen followed by liver. Injury characteristics of 886 trauma laparotomy patients’ data are presented in Table I and II.

 Table II. Organ damage due to different trauma characteristics

Damage Organ

                      Blunt

                       Penetrating

Accident

Conflict

Accident

Sharp object

Fire Arm

Liver

134

14

29

05

03

Liver and associated organs

112

06

11

02

01

Spleen

154

16

33

05

04

Spleen and associated organs

124

05

09

03

01

Kidneys

04

01

02

00

00

Small Intestine

76

04

05

02

01

Colon

98

05

09

05

02

Others

00

00

01

00

00

Mortality rate.     7.9%                                       
Negative laparotomy rate.  15.4 %


Historically, 40% of patients who underwent trauma laparotomies died. The death rates between 7 and 21% in more recent literature are noticeably lower. Damage Control Surgery (DCS) and Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR), which are now essential components of the treatment approach for critically injured trauma patients to lower the risk of morbidity and mortality, may in part be responsible for these positive outcomes.8,14,15
In our research, our population, which consists mainly of younger males, is comparable to prior studies. A significant source of morbidity and mortality is still a major trauma. An estimated 10% of injuries in Europe are due to abdominal trauma. Both blunt and penetrating injuries frequently necessitate surgical exploration in the form of a trauma laparotomy, despite the significance of the distinction between the two. 15% of the trauma population had piercing injuries. When compared to European and Scandinavian nations, this is greater, but it is on a level with other nations outside of Europe.7-9
Mortality rates associated with trauma laparotomies have been reported to range from 6 to 21% globally.5,16 We found that spleen, liver, and colon injuries were overrepresented among the injuries, and that the overall fatality rate was 5.9%. Here, we include auto accidents as the most frequent causes of blunt and penetrating trauma. The liver and spleen were the two most often affected organs. The use of laparotomy is not required due to its complications, according to recent findings, which also show that imaging modalities and a number of biomarkers can be utilized to diagnose trauma in the present era.6,8 This is yet further highlighted by the fact that our population is using this strategy more often, as seen by the fact that our negative laparotomy rates (15.4%) are far higher than the published rates of 3.9% from worldwide high-volume centers. However, other research has shown that negative laparotomy incidences can range widely, from 6 to 36%. One reason is that more patients with blunt liver or splenic damage trauma can avoid having a laparotomy because the increased access to interventional radiology.3-5 Depending on the surgical experience of the care team, both unfavorable laparotomy rates and overall results may be affected.

This study's overall rates, results, and outcomes of trauma laparotomies are comparable to those from comparable European trauma systems, but they are different from data from locations with higher incidence of penetrating traumas.

  1. Liu X, Sheng W, Gong Y, Gao W, Zhang B. Negative surgical exploration in suspected gastrointestinal perforation: trend, preoperative predictors, and etiologies. Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(10):832. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-8158.
  2. An SB, Kim BC, Kim JY, et al. Results of Laparotomy and Laparoscopy for Perforated Colonic Diverticulitis. JSLS 2019;23:e2019.00007. https://doi.org/10.4293%2FJSLS.2019.00007
  3. Bowie JM, Badiee J, Calvo RY, Sise MJ, Wessels LE, Butler WJ, et al. Outcomes after single-look trauma laparotomy: a large population-based study. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 7]. p. 565–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002167
  4. Ogbuanya AU, Anyanwu SN, Akuma A, et al. Surgical Capacity in Rural Southeast Nigeria: Barriers and New Opportunities. Annals of Global Surgery. 2021; 87(1): 118–132. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3367
  5. Olaogun JB, Etonyeaku AC, Ige JT, Wuraola OK. Penetrating abdominal injuries in an emerging semi-urban teaching hospital. J Emerg Pract Trauma. 2020; 6(1): 7–12.
  6. Hietbrink F, Smeeing D, Karhof S, Jonkers HF, Houwert M, van Wessem K, et al. Outcome of trauma-related emergency laparotomies, in an era of far-reaching specialization. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs13017-019-0257-y
  7. Bäckman PB, Riddez L, Adamsson L, Wahlgren CM. Epidemiology of firearm injuries in a Scandinavian trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(3):641–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1045-1
  8. Marsden MER, Vulliamy PED, Carden R, Naumann DN, Davenport RA, Nnajiuba HO, et al. Trauma laparotomy in the UK: a prospective national service evaluation. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;233(3):383–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.04.031
  9. Kosola J, Brinck T, Leppäniemi A, Handolin L. Blunt abdominal trauma in a European trauma setting: need for complex or non-complex skills in emergency laparotomy. Scand J Surg. 2020;109(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496919828244
  10. Davis JW, Dirks RC, Jeffcoach DR, Kaups KL, Sue LP, Lilienstein JT, et al. Mortality in hypotensive trauma patients requiring laparotomy is related to degree of hypotension and provides evidence for focused interventions. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021;6(1):e000723. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000723
  11. Ogbuanya AU, Ugwu NB. Emergency laparotomy at district hospitals in a developing nation. J Emerg Pract. Traum. 2021; 7(2): 111–11. https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2021.06
  12. Cocco AM, Bhagvan S, Bouffler C, Hsu J. Diagnostic laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(4):353–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15140
  13. Smyth L, Bendinelli C, Lee N, Reeds MG, Loh EJ, Amico F, et al. WSES guidelines on blunt and penetrating bowel injury: diagnosis, investigations, and treatment. World J Emerg Surg. 2022;17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00418-y
  14. Tang A, Chehab M, Ditillo M, Asmar S, Khurrum M, Douglas M, et al. Regionalization of trauma care by operative experience: does the volume of emergent laparotomy matter? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;90(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002911
  15. Lotfollahzadeh S, Burns B. Penetrating Abdominal Trauma. [Updated 2023 Feb 15]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459123/
  16. Ogbuanya AU, Enemuo VC, Eni UE, Nwigwe CG, Otuu O. Mortality audit in general surgery unit and lessons learned at a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a single centre observational study. Pan Afr Med J. 2022; 41(228): e29075. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.41.228.29075